Philosophy Dictionary of ArgumentsHome
| |||
|
| |||
| Author | Concept | Summary/Quotes | Sources |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Ullin Thomas Place on Sensory Impressions - Dictionary of Arguments
Place II 52 Sensory Experience/Place: sensory impressions cannot tell us that we are to introduce new categories or should banish old ones. - And yet, people have developed the language to organize their environment and describe, as it is dictated by their sense organs. - But a conceptual scheme ((s) needed for cateorization) is mind-dependent. ((s) >Cf >Categorization/Psychological theories, >Conceptual schemes.)_____________Explanation of symbols: Roman numerals indicate the source, arabic numerals indicate the page number. The corresponding books are indicated on the right hand side. ((s)…): Comment by the sender of the contribution. Translations: Dictionary of Arguments The note [Concept/Author], [Author1]Vs[Author2] or [Author]Vs[term] resp. "problem:"/"solution:", "old:"/"new:" and "thesis:" is an addition from the Dictionary of Arguments. If a German edition is specified, the page numbers refer to this edition. |
Place I U. T. Place Dispositions as Intentional States In Dispositions, Tim Crane, London New York 1996 Place II U. T. Place A Conceptualist Ontology In Dispositions, Tim Crane, London New York 1996 Place III U. T. Place Structural Properties: Categorical, Dispositional, or both? In Dispositions, Tim Crane, London New York 1996 Place IV U. T. Place Conceptualism and the Ontological Independence of Cause and Effect In Dispositions, Tim Crane, London New York 1996 Place V U. T. Place Identifying the Mind: Selected Papers of U. T. Place Oxford 2004 |
||
> Counter arguments against Place
> Counter arguments in relation to Sensory Impressions
Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2024-04-27